Public Enemy #1


Anthony and Mrs. Weiner during gayer times, apparently at the Mauritius Independence Day parade



















This is the problem with our economy, right here. Get ready for the one Anthony Weiner piece that has nothing to do with sex. Or sexting. Or sextuplets.

The man pictured above, as you probably know, is America’s newest ex-congressman. Some embarrassing details recently came out about him, each revelation more damning than the previous one, culminating in by far the most shameful one of all. From the London Daily Mail:

Anthony Weiner owes between $10,000 and $15,000 on his American Express card.

This man was entrusted with 1/435 of congressional spending decisions. Considering that the current year’s budget sits at $3.8 trillion, you could argue that Weiner was responsible for spending $8.8 billion of your money.

Read that again: a man with a 5-digit credit card bill was making financial decisions for you and me.

It gets better. Over each of the last three years he averaged more than $700 in parking tickets. Well, that’s how much he averaged in unpaid tickets. We’re not sure how many parking infractions he incurred and actually paid for. Weiner also committed fraud by placing the registration sticker for one of his cheaper cars on his more expensive SUV.

The story implies that Weiner owns at least 3 vehicles. While living in a two-person household. And carrying up to $15,000 in American Express debt. (Not sure if he has other cards.) As to why someone who lives in the most urbanized part of the country and doesn’t have kids is driving a Nissan Pathfinder (current models run about $30,000), you’ll have to ask private citizen Weiner.

Maybe he paid cash for all the cars, and isn’t carrying any monthly payments. And maybe he and his wife have a healthy marriage, too.

And – we’re so not done yet – that part about not having kids? Weiner recently announced that he and his wife of a year are expecting a child. A fortuitous announcement, made a couple of weeks ago, because the pregnancy status of congressmen’s wives is routinely of interest to the nation. Good for the Weiners, though: when you’ve got a large liability on your books, one that’s costing you probably 19% interest, that’s the time you want to create another mouth to feed. (Never mind that Weiner will be in his mid-60s when the kid graduates high school.)

Look at the details of his expenditures. See those monthly processing fees? Weiner was paying for the privilege of spending his own money – money he collected as a servant of the United States taxpayer.

If you’re on the fence about leaving a comment on today’s post, leave one in response to the following question: What would be the harm in requiring candidates for Congress to carry zero credit card debt? Or at least in requiring them not to be paying processing fees, which are among the most idiotic and unnecessary expenditures a person can incur? Such a requirement would never become law, because the mice are in charge of the cheese, but still.

A man in his mid-40s, with zero dependents (his wife has a full-time job), and a (useless, political science) degree from a state college, making a six-digit salary, and this is what his personal finances look like.

That Weiner’s inability – no, refusal – to build wealth and take responsibility for his finances barely warranted a mention during his recent story arc in the news is yet another symptom of a fatal disease. His negative cash flow isn’t even remarkable by congressional standards. And again, every sentence in this post could be followed by the following: he’s partially responsible for authorizing federal expenditures.

If you’re nonchalant about your credit card bills to the point where you’re incurring processing fees every single month, many of them in the high triple-digits, while incurring parking tickets regularly and buying more cars than you can possibly drive, why on earth would you bother being judicious when spending other people’s money?

Weiner represented less than ¼% of the problem, too. His ilk remain and continue to spend taxpayer money at uncontrollable (and uncontrollably accelerating) rates. It bears repeating that every dollar confiscated from taxpayers doesn’t only carry the potential to be wasted, but reduces the taxpayers’ own autonomy proportionally. That’s one fewer dollar that could have been invested back in the economy as its original owner saw fit. Meanwhile, the congressman who carries no credit card debt, earns money by providing a legitimate service in the private sector, doesn’t draw a pension on principle, and refuses to let his kids put taxpayers on the hook by financing their educations via student loans, is beyond rare.

Weiner can find money when there’s a sufficiently important purpose in the balance, however. He had somehow managed to scrounge up $3 million for a run at a forthcoming New York mayoral race. The people get the government they deserve, indeed.

**This article is featured in the Carnival of Personal Finance #315: Bring on the Long Weekends**


Majority of the Tyranny

Founded c. 1775. Hope lost c. 2010.

We try not to get political here, but sometimes it’s impossible. So before we begin this week’s post, here’s some of our philosophy, without getting too detailed. These are not so much opinions as they are objective truths:

  • Governments should only provide what competition and a marketplace can’t – i.e., what everyone can benefit from, but which no private individual or business could receive a tangible return on were they to pay for it themselves. (Unlike governments, private agents have an incentive to reduce waste and increase efficiency – because they’re not using money blatantly confiscated from other people under penalty of death.) Which means governments should provide police, courts, a military, maybe some roads and not a lot else.
  • Taxpayer dollars are sacred and should be treated with the utmost of care.
  • Governments almost always do more harm than good.
  • Governments don’t and can’t create wealth. They can only take it from some and award it to others.
  • The higher the level of government, the greater the potential for damage and the greater the likelihood of inertia. It’s easier to reason with a county official than a state official than a federal official than a UN official.
  • Your job is not as critical to you as a politician’s is to him or her. Reelection is more important to a politician than any of the following: promoting individual freedom, increasing prosperity, fostering peace, curing disease, reducing and/or punishing crime. In other words, if a politician does something that seems illogical, it probably isn’t. It’s done with a nod to ultimately securing exposure, donations, or something that will hopefully result in more votes or the elimination of rivals.

If any of that sounds outlandish, let us know. Because this is what sounds outlandish to us:

The American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act of 2010. Like many other federal bills, this one’s title obscures more than it explains. You can read the 28-page summary here.

This bill punishes small businesspeople harder for committing the unforgivable, possibly racist and maybe even carbon-positive sin of trying to earn money without sucking at the ever-augmenting public teat.

In our new book (available in both physical and Kindle format on Amazon), we devote the final chapter to entrepreneurship – which is the only way to create lasting wealth. You really have to read the book (did we mention it’s also available at, but in it we encourage you incorporate your small business as an S corporation – a special designation that gives you tax breaks single proprietors never experience. Setting up an S corporation costs only a few bucks but pays for itself many times over the course of your business. Or at least it did.

An S corporation lets you pay yourself a reasonable salary out of your profits, the remainder of which gets distributed among your corporation’s shareholders at the end of the year. This is NOT subject to self-employment tax, which is 15.3%.

The new law would affect anyone who has a professional services S corporation with fewer than 3 shareholders who actually have a hand in the company. In other words, one or 2 shareholders. In other words, people who would otherwise operate as a single proprietorship or a partnership – which are the most tax-disadvantaged ways to organize your business.

So if you’re an attorney, a recording engineer, a medical transcriptionist, a hairstylist, whatever – that all changes with the new law. It just becomes that much more difficult to operate, in an economic climate that isn’t exactly friendly in the first place.

People respond to incentives. This will encourage some people to simply give up their entrepreneurial dreams and go back to work for the stifling, soul-crushing man. It’ll encourage other people to get a little more creative with their business deductions. From the government’s perspective, this is wonderful – it’ll give all those new IRS agents something to do and someone to pester.

Here’s how your representative voted. The Senate is apparently set to give the House bill its imprimatur soon enough.

The Congressional Budget Office itself acknowledges that the bill would increase our already semi-comical deficit by $174 billion. (Oh, you think that’s cause for alarm? Look at you, you adorable little idealist. I bet you might even write a letter to your representative and senators, as if they read them or think your opinion matters.)

When is Congress holding its next hearing concerning whose nipple appeared on which TV broadcast? Or which baseball players injected what substances into their posteriors? Or which idiot thought the brake pedal on her Lexus was the one on the right? As long as it results in camera time for the politicians in question, who cares if it takes away from the business of actually freeing up the economy and letting capital and resources get allocated in the most efficient way?

But remember: it’s evil, greedy businessmen who are killing the country. Politicians and those committed to a life of public service are the real heroes.

(Thanks to Diane Kennedy of for drawing our attention to this horrid bill.)